Table of Contents
Ready to See Results?
From strategy to execution, we turn underperforming campaigns into measurable wins. Let’s put our expertise to work for your business.
A Surge of State AI Bills With Health Care Impact
State legislatures across the U.S. are moving aggressively to regulate artificial intelligence in health care — including how AI is used in clinical settings, payer reviews, patient communication tools, and mental-health technologies. With more than 250 AI-related health care bills introduced in at least 47 states through late 2025, this patchwork of state action is creating a regulatory landscape that behavioral health providers can’t ignore.
Because federal AI regulation has not yet materialized, states are stepping in to set their own rules. The breadth of these bills is wide, but several common themes are emerging:
Notable Examples by State
While the legislative landscape varies widely, several states illustrate how this trend is unfolding:
Maryland, Arizona, Nebraska, and Texas have each enacted AI-related health care legislation that addresses how health plans and insurers use algorithmic tools, requiring protections such as:
In Colorado, the Colorado AI Act, evolving through bills like Senate Bill 205 and later Senate Bill 4, sets a framework for accountability and bias mitigation in AI systems that could affect health care decision-making and consumer protections.
Wikipedia
Other states are exploring similar content, often combining transparency requirements with consumer safeguards. Legislative trackers show this activity stretching across states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and more.
What This Means for Behavioral Health Providers
Behavioral health organizations need to understand that these state AI bills are not abstract tech policy discussions — they have practical implications for how providers adopt and govern AI tools, including technologies used in:
Inconsistent state standards could mean that an AI governance policy that complies in one jurisdiction may fall short in another. Providers operating multi-state systems will need cross-jurisdictional AI governance frameworks that ensure compliance with the most restrictive applicable rules.
Why State Action Is Intensifying
The surge in state AI legislation stems from a policy vacuum at the federal level. With no unified federal standard in place, lawmakers are acting to protect patients and prevent harms such as algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and unmonitored clinical automation. Experts predict this momentum will continue even as federal proposals are debated.
Behavioral health leaders should also be aware that states are monitoring risks beyond health care, such as generative AI transparency, deepfake content, and automated decision-making in insurance and employment; signaling broader regulatory expectations that could influence future health AI rules.
What Behavioral Health Leaders Should Do Now
State-level AI regulation in health care is no longer emerging, it’s here. For behavioral health systems, clinicians, and compliance leaders alike, staying ahead of these rules is essential to responsibly adopt AI technologies that support care delivery while protecting patients and organizational risk.