Table of Contents
Ready to See Results?
From strategy through execution, Atlantic Health Strategies integrates compliance, operations, and growth into durable, measurable results. Let’s put our expertise to work for your organization.
The short answer, up front
Behavioral health operators should study the AHCCCS playbook now, because your state Medicaid agency already is. Tighten patient-brokering controls, sober-living affiliation disclosures, credentialing files, and ASAM level-of-care documentation before your state Medicaid agency copies AHCCCS.
On May 14, 2026, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes and the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) reported a 92% drop in suspect behavioral health Medicaid billing tied to a sober-living scheme that exploited the American Indian Health Program (AIHP) fee-for-service rates. Per the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, AHCCCS recorded approximately $3,114,163,966 in behavioral health code billing in the American Indian Health Plan during 2021 to 2023, then watched that figure drop to approximately $229,942,919 from 2024 to 2026, a 92% decline. Since 2023, the office has indicted 140 people and businesses, secured convictions against 41 people or entities, and reported more than $139 million in cash and real estate recovered or seized.
Mayes did not soften the framing: “billing to the programs targeted in this scheme has dropped by an astonishing 92% since we launched our fraud crackdown. We are not done.” Operators in any 1115-waiver state should assume the same enforcement template is being drafted right now.
What actually triggered AHCCCS to act
The trigger was not a single bad actor. It was a billing pattern the state could not explain. Beginning in 2020, Arizona saw a dramatic surge in outpatient behavioral health billing to the American Indian Health Plan. The state reimbursed behavioral health providers for certain AIHP services at about 59% of the amount billed, with no cap, until AHCCCS revised the policy and established a set reimbursement rate for intensive outpatient treatment. That is the vulnerability the criminal enterprises priced.
Investigators found that unlicensed sober living operators recruited Native Americans from tribal communities across the Southwest and transported them to Valley homes to bill AHCCCS for services never rendered.
In May 2023, Governor Katie Hobbs and Attorney General Mayes announced coordinated state action. Per the AHCCCS payment suspension announcement, AHCCCS suspended payments to more than 100 unique, registered behavioral health providers based on credible allegations of fraud, in conjunction with the Arizona Attorney General’s Healthcare Fraud and Abuse Section, the FBI, HHS, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the IRS. Carmen Heredia, the AHCCCS director, framed the referral pattern directly: the OIG and the Attorney General’s Office “became aware of potential fraudulent billing practices including significant increases in outpatient behavioral health services” and connected the irregular billing with alleged criminal activity targeting tribal communities.
The human ledger behind the billing chart is what indicts the delay. At least 40 people died in the homes, mostly of drug and alcohol abuse, while the state grappled with the situation, according to reporting by ProPublica and the Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting. Approximately 200 sober-living-related investigations remain open at the AG’s office.
How AHCCCS tightened the screws (and what your state will likely copy)
The corrective build-out is the part behavioral health operators should study line by line. Per AHCCCS, Credible Allegations of Fraud (CAF) suspensions are the first step of required action when Medicaid payment fraud is identified, and the beginning of multi-agency investigations. Under federal regulations, AHCCCS is required to suspend all payments to a provider when it determines that a credible allegation of fraud exists.
Here is the operator-level control matrix I now recommend at every behavioral health client operating in a 1115 SUD demonstration state:
- Credentialing file integrity. Every Behavioral Health Professional linked to your facility should have a current license check, NPDB query, OIG/SAM exclusion check, and a signed disclosure of every other facility they supervise. The TUSA case showed why. Nurse practitioner Rita Anagho operated TUSA Integrated Clinic and served as the behavioral health professional for around 10 to 15 other behavioral health facilities, many of which have since been suspended or terminated. Anagho was sentenced to 3.5 years in prison, and her office said she has been ordered to pay $55 million in restitution in the separate federal case.
- Sober-living affiliation disclosure. If you accept referrals from a recovery residence, document the relationship, the certification (NARR affiliate where available), and any financial flow. Then assume an EKRA reviewer will read it.
- ASAM Criteria, 4th Edition justification. Every Level 2.1 intensive outpatient and Level 2.5 partial hospitalization admission needs documented multidimensional risk findings tied to the 4th Edition dimensions, not legacy 3rd Edition language. Both PHP and IOP are outpatient levels of care. Surveyor focus is on this now.
- Weekly hour reconciliation. Before a PHP or IOP claim drops, verify the patient actually met the level-of-care hour minimum that week. This is the single most common documentation gap I see.
- Attendance-to-billing reconciliation. If your scheduling system, attendance logs, and billing system are not talking to each other daily, you are one chart audit away from a recoupment.
EKRA, AKS, and why Arizona is not the only state about to act
The Arizona case is sitting on top of a national enforcement curve. The Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act (EKRA), enacted in 2018 as part of the SUPPORT Act and codified at 18 U.S.C. § 220, made it a federal crime to pay or receive remuneration for referring a patient to a recovery home, clinical treatment facility, or laboratory. A person who violates EKRA may be fined up to $200,000, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both, for each occurrence.
EKRA has fewer safe harbors than the AKS. The most consequential gap involves employee compensation. EKRA has fewer safe harbors than the AKS and notably does not protect volume-based or commission-based compensation for employees or contractors, even if they are W-2 employees. On July 11, 2025, the Ninth Circuit upheld the EKRA conviction in United States v. Schena, holding that EKRA covers payments to marketing intermediaries and not only direct referrers. Read that twice if you have marketers on any variable comp plan.
DOJ has already linked EKRA-style conduct directly to the Arizona scheme. Per the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona, Farrukh Jarar Ali, 41, of Pakistan, was charged by indictment with conspiracy to commit health care fraud and wire fraud, three counts of wire fraud, and money laundering in connection with an alleged $650 million scheme involving at least 41 substance abuse treatment clinics in Arizona. Ali owned ProMD Solutions, a Pakistan-based company that provided credentialing, enrollment, medical coding, and billing services for outpatient treatment centers, but these clinics did not provide legitimate care to patients, many of whom were recruited from the homeless population or Native American reservations.
Other states have been here before. Florida’s Patient Brokering Act, enforced by the Palm Beach County Sober Homes Task Force and the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA), has been used aggressively for years against treatment-to-sober-living kickback arrangements. In the Markovich prosecution out of the Southern District of Florida, Jonathan and Daniel Markovich were sentenced to 188 months and 97 months respectively after a jury convicted them on charges arising from bribes paid to patients, patient recruiters, and lab referral kickbacks tied to two South Florida addiction treatment facilities. Pennsylvania DDAP licensure inspections follow similar logic. If you operate in a 1115 SUD demonstration state with growing managed-care or fee-for-service SUD spend, assume your Medicaid agency is reading the AHCCCS year-in-review.
The operator takeaway
Compliance officers who wait for a subpoena to reorganize their credentialing files are already late. The scale of what federal enforcers are willing to charge should settle the question of whether to act. Per the Department of Justice, the 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown resulted in criminal charges against 324 defendants, including 96 doctors, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and other licensed medical professionals, in 50 federal districts and 12 State Attorneys General’s Offices, in schemes involving over $14.6 billion in intended loss. The government seized over $245 million in cash, luxury vehicles, cryptocurrency, and other assets, and CMS prevented over $4 billion in payments while suspending or revoking billing privileges of 205 providers in the months leading up to the Takedown.
Attorney General Pamela Bondi framed the takedown this way: “This record-setting Health Care Fraud Takedown delivers justice to criminal actors who prey upon our most vulnerable citizens and steal from hardworking American taxpayers.”
If you run a treatment center in Arizona, Florida, Ohio, or Pennsylvania, or any 1115 SUD demonstration state, do three things this quarter. Rebuild your credentialing files so every Behavioral Health Professional is linked to every facility they supervise. Rewrite your marketing and referral contracts against EKRA, not just AKS. Put a real attendance-to-billing reconciliation on the calendar every Friday. The AHCCCS playbook is public. Use it before your Medicaid agency does.
Frequently asked questions
What specifically triggered AHCCCS’s payment suspensions in the AIHP sober-living fraud case?
A Credible Allegation of Fraud (CAF) review under federal Medicaid program integrity rules. Per AHCCCS, CAF payment suspensions are the first step of required action when Medicaid payment fraud is identified and mark the beginning of multi-agency investigations. Under federal regulations, AHCCCS is required to suspend all payments to a provider once it determines a credible allegation of fraud exists. In May 2023, the state suspended payments to more than 100 registered behavioral health providers simultaneously in conjunction with the Arizona AG’s Healthcare Fraud and Abuse Section, the FBI, HHS, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the IRS.
How much fraudulent billing has DOJ tied to the Arizona AHCCCS scheme so far?
In the 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona charged Farrukh Jarar Ali, 41, of Pakistan, in an alleged $650 million scheme involving at least 41 substance abuse treatment clinics that billed AHCCCS through his Pakistan-based billing company, ProMD Solutions. Rita Anagho, the nurse practitioner behind TUSA Integrated Clinic, was ordered to pay $55 million in restitution in her federal case and sentenced to 3.5 years in prison in her state case. Statewide, AG Mayes reports 140 indictments, 41 convictions, and more than $139 million in cash and real estate recovered or seized since 2023.
If my treatment center is in Florida or Pennsylvania, could this enforcement model spread to my state?
Yes, and the parallel infrastructure already exists. Florida’s Patient Brokering Act, the Palm Beach County Sober Homes Task Force, and federal EKRA prosecutions like the Markovich case in the Southern District of Florida (188-month and 97-month sentences for treatment center owners) show the same template applied to treatment-to-sober-living kickback arrangements. The Ninth Circuit’s July 2025 ruling in United States v. Schena expanded EKRA to reach marketing intermediaries, not only direct referrers. Pennsylvania DDAP licensure inspections follow similar logic. Operators should not wait for their state Medicaid agency to copy the AHCCCS press release.
How should operators handle sober-living referral relationships to stay compliant with Medicaid and EKRA?
Treat the affiliation as a regulated relationship, not a marketing one. Use a written agreement, fair-market-value rent or services, no per-head payments, no free housing tied to staying enrolled in treatment, and no variable compensation tied to referral volume for W-2 marketers. Under EKRA (18 U.S.C. § 220), penalties reach $200,000 per occurrence and up to ten years in prison, and the AKS bona fide employee safe harbor does not save you. Document every referral source, keep the compensation methodology defensible, and assume a federal reviewer will read every contract.
References
- Arizona Attorney General’s Office: Behavioral Health Fraud Sentence and 92% Decrease in Behavioral Health Code Billing (May 14, 2026)
- AHCCCS: Payment Suspensions Announcement (May 2023)
- U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona: 7 Defendants Charged as Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown
- DOJ: 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown, 324 Defendants, $14.6 Billion
- Morgan Lewis: Ninth Circuit Ruling in United States v. Schena Confirms Strength of EKRA (August 2025)
- Kilpatrick Townsend: Health Care’s Expanding Landscape of Criminal Anti-Bribery Enforcement (Markovich analysis)
- Becker’s Behavioral Health: Arizona AG Touts Behavioral Health Fraud Crackdown Progress
- Axios Phoenix: Arizona AG Still Investigating 200 Sober Living Home Medicaid Fraud Cases