Table of Contents
Ready to See Results?
From strategy through execution, Atlantic Health Strategies integrates compliance, operations, and growth into durable, measurable results. Let’s put our expertise to work for your organization.
The short answer: Nebraska went first, and your census clock started May 1
Nebraska became the first state in the country to enforce Medicaid work requirements on May 1, 2026, and behavioral health operators in Omaha, Lincoln, and Kearney have roughly 60 to 90 days before census, AR aging, and denial rates start moving the wrong direction. The first meaningful wave of disenrollments will hit claims in Q3 2026, tied to renewals ending July 31 and after.
The trigger is federal, not state. Governor Jim Pillen and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz announced in December 2025 that Nebraska would implement H.R. 1’s community engagement requirements roughly eight months ahead of the federal January 2027 deadline.
Here is the rule in plain terms. Per Nebraska DHHS: “Starting May 1, 2026, members and applicants eligible under Medicaid expansion will have to meet work requirements to keep or get Medicaid coverage.” Adults ages 19 to 64 in the expansion population (Heritage Health Adult) must document 80 hours in a calendar month of qualifying activity, or earn at least $580 in a calendar month, or sit inside an exemption category.
The scale is not theoretical. An estimated 72,000 Nebraskans will be subject to the policy, and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities projects about 25,000 Nebraskans will lose Medicaid coverage from the combined H.R. 1 provisions, a 35 percent decline in the expansion population. For SUD and mental health programs in those three cities, that is a census problem with a known fuse length.
Arkansas remains the closest historical comparison. More than 18,000 Arkansans lost coverage in the first months of implementation, and researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found the policy did not boost employment. The losses were a paperwork failure, not a behavioral one.
Exemption pathways exist on paper. Your admissions team makes them real
Nebraska’s rule includes a medically frail exemption and pathways covering people with substance use disorder and serious mental illness. Neither is automatic.
Under H.R. 1, states must verify individuals’ work or exemption status at application and at every renewal, and KFF’s summary of P.L. 119-21 confirms that expansion adults face redeterminations every six months. That means twice-a-year exposure to the same paperwork failure that sank Arkansas.
A patient sitting in your Level 3.5 clinically managed residential program, or your Level 2.5 partial hospitalization program (which is outpatient, full stop), does not get exempted because they walked through your door. They get exempted because someone on your admissions or UM team submits the medically frail attestation or hardship documentation to DHHS inside the window. Miss the window and the patient is disenrolled.
Per the Governor’s Office release: “Individuals found non-compliant will receive notice and have 30 days to meet the requirement or claim an exemption before denial or disenrollment.” Thirty days is not a generous window when your patient is in active withdrawal management or has just stepped down to residential.
Arkansas operators learned this the hard way. Providers delivered care in good faith and then ate 30 to 45 days of services because eligibility had quietly terminated. CMS issued an interim final rule in June 2026, and per CMS Medicaid Director Dan Brillman, “If your condition significantly impairs your ability to engage in work and the requirements, then you are likely not subject to the work requirements.” Self-attestation alone will not carry the day.
Build the exemption submission into intake. Not into discharge planning. Intake. Day one, next to the ROI and the financial responsibility form.
Pro forma stress tests: what to actually model
If your pro forma assumes a static Medicaid mix, throw it out. The federal macro is unambiguous.
KFF, citing CBO, reports that work requirements are estimated to reduce federal Medicaid spending by $326 billion over ten years, the largest single share of the roughly $911 billion in total Medicaid cuts in the law. CBO’s earlier analysis projected 5.2 million adults losing Medicaid by 2034. The Urban Institute, cited by CBPP, projects 4.9 million people will lose Medicaid coverage in 2028 from H.R. 1’s work requirement alone, rising to about 8 million when combined with the new six-month redetermination cycle.
For our Nebraska clients with 40 percent or higher Medicaid concentration, we model three scenarios on the expansion book:
- 12% coverage loss over 12 months (conservative, adjusted downward from Arkansas because Nebraska’s automated verification appears broader)
- 22% loss (mid case, aligned with CBPP’s projection of a 35% expansion-population decline blended across a Medicaid book that is not 100% expansion)
- 30% loss (upper end, consistent with the Urban Institute’s Nebraska estimate of about 36 percent of those subject to the rule)
At a 22 percent coverage loss, a 60-bed residential program billing an average $625 per diem on Medicaid sees roughly $1.8M in annualized revenue exposure before you factor in the increased denial rate from eligibility lapses.
Days in AR will stretch. We tell clients to budget for days in AR moving from the high 30s into the mid 50s during the first two quarters of implementation, because eligibility verification will be the single largest source of new denials.
For feasibility studies on new builds or acquisitions in work-requirement states, we now require a coverage-churn sensitivity layer. If the deal does not pencil at a 20 percent Medicaid attrition assumption on the expansion book, the deal does not pencil. AHS does not work in California or New York, but the Florida, Tennessee, and Ohio operators we serve are running the same math.
Intake, UM, and payer communication: the workflow changes that actually matter
Three concrete changes your team can implement this quarter.
1. Run a real-time eligibility check at admission, then again on day 15 and day 30 of any episode longer than two weeks. DHHS is phasing enforcement by renewal date, not all at once. Per DHHS statements to Nebraska Public Media: “Members with renewal dates in May or June 2026 will not be subject to the requirements. The first group impacted will be those with eligibility periods ending July 31, 2026, with phased implementation continuing through June 2027.” Most billing teams check eligibility once at admission and assume the coverage holds. That assumption is now wrong.
2. Designate a single staff member, usually inside UM or admissions, as the exemption submission owner. Their job is to file the medically frail or hardship exemption within 10 days of admission for every Medicaid expansion patient. Track it like you track prior auths. Same urgency, same accountability.
3. Open a written line with your Nebraska Medicaid managed care plans (Healthy Blue, Nebraska Total Care, Molina). Ask them, in writing, how they intend to handle claims for episodes that span an eligibility termination tied to work-requirement non-compliance. Get the answer in writing. When the first denials hit, you want a documented payer position to appeal against.
One more piece. Parity arguments under MHPAEA may apply where exemption administration is more burdensome for behavioral health conditions than for medical ones. Build a clean documentation trail now. You may need it.
The bigger picture, and a note from Amelia Island
Nebraska is not the story. Nebraska is first, and the federal floor underneath it forces every Medicaid expansion state to follow. States are required to implement work requirements by January 1, 2027.
Per CBPP’s tracking, Montana went live July 1, 2026, though it built a hold-harmless provision delaying coverage loss for current enrollees until January 1, 2027. Iowa and Arkansas are also moving early. If you operate in any of those states, Nebraska is your preview.
Behavioral health operators who built their census strategy around steady Medicaid expansion populations will feel this in clean claim rate, AR aging, and their ability to fund growth. Operators who get out ahead will treat this as an operational redesign rather than a policy headline.
Intake workflow, exemption tracking, eligibility re-verification cadence, payer documentation, pro forma sensitivity. None of it is glamorous. All of it decides whether your Medicaid book is a strength or a liability 18 months from now.
AHS is sponsoring the Women in Leadership Luncheon at NAATP National in Amelia Island, May 4 through 6. Allison, Benjamin, Leah, and I will be on site. If you operate in Nebraska, Iowa, Montana, or any of the next-wave states and want to walk through your specific numbers, find us there. Bring your Medicaid concentration percentage and your current days in AR. We can do useful work in 20 minutes.
Frequently asked questions
When does Nebraska’s Medicaid work requirement actually start affecting my patients?
Enforcement began May 1, 2026, but DHHS is phasing exposure by renewal date. Per a DHHS press release quoted by Nebraska Public Media: “Members with renewal dates in May or June 2026 will not be subject to the requirements. The first group impacted will be those with eligibility periods ending July 31, 2026, with phased implementation continuing through June 2027.” New applicants on or after May 1, 2026 must verify community engagement or claim an exemption at application. For behavioral health operators, the first meaningful wave of disenrollments hits claims in Q3 2026.
How many Nebraskans are expected to lose Medicaid coverage?
About 72,000 Nebraskans are subject to the requirement (NBC News). CBPP estimates between 28,000 and 41,000 are at risk of losing coverage and projects roughly 25,000 will actually lose coverage, a 35 percent decline in the expansion population. The Urban Institute, cited by CBS News, puts the Nebraska figure at approximately 25,000, or about 36 percent of those subject to the rule. The Arkansas precedent saw more than 18,000 people lose coverage in the first several months of implementation.
Are SUD and serious mental illness patients automatically exempt under the federal rule?
No. H.R. 1 (P.L. 119-21) includes a medically frail category that covers many SUD and SMI patients, but exemptions are not automatic. Per KFF, states must verify individuals’ work or exemption status at application and at every eligibility renewal, and expansion adults face redetermination every six months. CMS’s June 2026 interim final rule requires that a medical condition significantly impair the person’s ability to comply with the work requirement. If your admissions or UM team does not submit the exemption documentation, the patient is treated as non-compliant and gets a 30-day cure window before disenrollment, per Nebraska DHHS.
What financial impact should a Medicaid-heavy behavioral health operator model?
Run three scenarios on your expansion book: 12 percent coverage loss (conservative), 22 percent loss (mid case, aligned with CBPP’s 35 percent expansion decline blended into a mixed Medicaid book), and 30 percent loss (upper end, aligned with the Urban Institute’s Nebraska estimate of about 36 percent of those subject). At a 22 percent coverage loss, a 60-bed residential program billing $625 per diem on Medicaid faces roughly $1.8M in annualized revenue exposure before eligibility-related denials. Budget for days in AR moving from the high 30s to the mid 50s during the first two quarters. CBO estimates work requirements alone will reduce federal Medicaid spending by $326 billion over ten years.
References
- Nebraska DHHS: Work Requirements (official program page)
- Office of Governor Jim Pillen: Nebraska First in the Nation to Pursue Medicaid Work Requirements (Dec. 17, 2025)
- KFF: A Closer Look at the Work Requirement Provisions in the 2025 Federal Budget Reconciliation Law
- CBPP: Nebraska Launching Punitive Medicaid Work Requirements Early
- CBS News: Nebraska becomes first U.S. State to enact Medicaid work requirements
- NBC News: Nebraska rolls out Medicaid work requirements
- Nebraska Public Media: DHHS and advocates disagree on how implementation will go
- CBPP: Timing of State Implementation of H.R. 1’s Medicaid Policies
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health: Medicaid work requirements begin in Nebraska