Table of Contents
Ready to See Results?
From strategy through execution, Atlantic Health Strategies integrates compliance, operations, and growth into durable, measurable results. Let’s put our expertise to work for your organization.
The direct answer: rebuild eligibility verification and exemption documentation before your first mid-episode denial
Nebraska DHHS turned on Medicaid community engagement enforcement on May 1, 2026, and behavioral health operators who have not rebuilt eligibility workflow and exemption documentation will lose active-episode revenue inside the first two billing cycles. That is the answer. Everything below is how to execute against it.
Nebraska is the first state in the country to enforce the new federal Medicaid community engagement requirement. Nebraska DHHS confirms that starting May 1, 2026, members and applicants eligible under Medicaid expansion will have to meet work requirements to keep or get Medicaid coverage, months ahead of the federal statutory deadline of January 1, 2027. The requirement flows from H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into federal law on July 4, 2025.
Governor Pillen’s office and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz confirmed the rule applies to able-bodied adults ages 19 to 64 in the Medicaid expansion population, requiring at least 80 hours per month of work, approved work programs, community service, or educational activities, unless they qualify for an exemption. DHHS issued federally required outreach notices to the nearly 70,000 Medicaid expansion members. DHHS estimates about 40% of Medicaid expansion enrollees in the state make at least $580 a month, and 60-72% of members are likely already meeting work or community engagement requirements.
For operators running SUD and mental health programs under Heritage Health, the practical question is not whether the policy survives litigation. It is whether your front-desk and billing team can tell, on the date of service, that a patient lost coverage three weeks ago because they did not report hours through the state system. Most cannot. That is the gap.
The exemption category is your real revenue protection
Here is the operator-side fact buried in the policy debate: the medically frail and SUD treatment exemptions do most of the work protecting your census, and they only protect your revenue if your team documents them into the state record.
Arkansas is the cautionary tale. KFF documented that more than 18,000 people lost coverage, or about 25% of the population subject to the requirement, primarily due to failure to regularly report work status or document eligibility for an exemption. The most-cited peer-reviewed evaluation, published in Health Affairs by Sommers and colleagues, found that work requirements did not increase employment over eighteen months of follow-up, and that people in Arkansas ages 30-49 who had lost Medicaid in the prior year experienced adverse consequences: 50 percent reported serious problems paying off medical debt, 56 percent delayed care because of cost, and 64 percent delayed medications because of cost. Sommers himself puts the diagnosis bluntly in Tradeoffs: “The best case scenario [for work requirements] is a complicated process to nudge a very small number of beneficiaries into work.”
Nebraska is trying to head off some of that Arkansas churn on the front end. DHHS said many enrollees “are expected to qualify based on existing information without needing to take additional action,” and the department is using claims and other state data to auto-verify where it can. That is a real opening for behavioral health operators, but only if the diagnosis and level of care are already in the claims stream at the moment DHHS runs its check.
If you run an intensive outpatient program (ASAM Level 2.1) or a residential SUD program in Omaha or Lincoln, your active census is almost entirely exemption-eligible. Patients in active SUD treatment qualify. Patients with a serious mental illness diagnosis often qualify. Patients in withdrawal management, which under the ASAM Criteria 4th Edition includes Level 3.7 Residential Detoxification, qualify on the medically frail track. Your clinical documentation has to speak to functional impairment, not just diagnosis.
The dollars are real. A 60-bed residential program running an average Medicaid daily rate around $385 with an average length of stay of 28 days is looking at roughly $10,780 per admission at risk if a patient gets disenrolled mid-stay because nobody filed an exemption attestation. Multiply across a year and a single mid-size facility can easily see $400,000 to $700,000 in avoidable write-offs.
Fix the eligibility verification workflow first
Most behavioral health operators in Nebraska check eligibility at admission and again at discharge. That cadence will not survive work requirements.
Under the Nebraska framework, individuals found non-compliant will receive notice and have 30 days to meet the requirement or claim an exemption before denial or disenrollment. If your average residential stay is 28 days, you can admit a covered patient and discharge an uncovered one without anyone on your team noticing until the 835 comes back denied.
Nebraska is not planning to soften the ramp with new staff or funding. Nebraska Public Media reported that DHHS is not planning to hire new staff members to assist with Medicaid enrollment. There is also no new state funding allocated to support the additional verification. Translation: eligibility errors on the state side are going to happen, and your billing team has to catch them.
What operators should build now:
- Weekly eligibility re-verification on every active Medicaid patient, not monthly. Run it through the Nebraska Medicaid eligibility portal or your clearinghouse 270/271 transaction.
- A flag in your EHR for any patient whose coverage status changes mid-episode, routed to a named person, not a shared inbox.
- A standing exemption documentation packet at intake: SUD diagnosis with DSM-5-TR code, ASAM level of care assignment, functional-impairment language, and a signed medically frail attestation when clinically appropriate. Push it into the state record, not just your chart.
- Direct escalation channels with the three Heritage Health MCOs, so your billing team can push back on redetermination errors before they hit AR.
A facility I worked with during a prior state-level policy transition saw days in AR jump from 38 to 61 in the first quarter after the change, entirely because of mid-episode eligibility loss the billing team did not catch until the denials landed.
Heritage Health contracts and the parity angle
Your Heritage Health contracts sit with the three MCOs Nebraska awarded for the current term: Molina Healthcare of Nebraska, Nebraska Total Care, and UnitedHealthcare, under contracts that began January 1, 2024. Those contracts contain language on member eligibility changes, retroactive terminations, and continuity of care. Most operators have not read those clauses in years. Pull them. The MCO is typically required to honor authorizations for a defined period after eligibility loss, particularly for active SUD treatment episodes. That clause gives your billing team a real argument in a denial appeal.
Parity is the second pressure point, and it is more complicated than it was a year ago. On May 15, 2025, the Departments of Labor, HHS, and Treasury announced a non-enforcement policy for the new portions of the 2024 MHPAEA Final Rule. The statement is explicit: “The Departments will not enforce the 2024 Final Rule or otherwise pursue enforcement actions, based on a failure to comply that occurs prior to a final decision in the litigation, plus an additional 18 months.”
Read the next line. The Departments also note that MHPAEA’s statutory obligations, as amended by the CAA, 2021, continue to have effect. The 2013 rule and the CAA 2021 NQTL comparative analysis requirement still bind the MCOs.
Translation for operators: if Nebraska’s implementation forces SUD patients through a more complex exemption process than diabetes or cardiac patients, that is a parity question the MCO’s compliance team has to take seriously, even in the current enforcement climate. I would not file a parity complaint as a first move. I would put the parity citation in the appeal letter on every denial tied to work requirement disenrollment. It changes the tone of the conversation with provider relations.
What to do in the next 90 days
Operators who wait for further DHHS clarification will be six months behind. Georgia is the warning. A September 2025 GAO report found that Georgia’s Pathways to Coverage program spent $54.2 million between October 2020 and March 2025. Most of these funds, $47.4 million, came from the federal government. We found weaknesses in federal oversight of this spending. Reporting from The Current and ProPublica compared that $54.2 million on administrative costs since 2021, compared to $26.1 million spent on health care costs, with nearly 90% of administrative expenditures came from the federal budget. The administrative machinery is expensive and the eligibility churn is real. Both problems land on your billing team.
The work to do now is unglamorous and entirely within your control:
- Audit the last 12 months of Medicaid denials and tag any that involved mid-episode eligibility loss. That is your baseline.
- Rewrite your intake packet so SUD diagnosis, ASAM level, functional impairment, and medically frail status are documented on day one and pushed into the state record, not just your EHR.
- Train your billing team on the 270/271 cadence and assign a named owner for weekly eligibility checks. Not a department. A person.
- Pull your three Heritage Health contracts and highlight the continuity of care, retroactive termination, and authorization honor language. Build an appeal template from it.
- Run a pro forma showing the revenue impact if 8% of your Medicaid census loses coverage mid-episode. Show it to your board now, not after it happens.
Nebraska will not be alone for long. Other Medicaid expansion states are moving toward the January 1, 2027 federal deadline, and operators who build the eligibility and exemption infrastructure now get a quieter benefit either way: cleaner claims, fewer write-offs, and a billing operation that does not panic the next time a state changes the rules. The work is the work.
Frequently asked questions
When did Nebraska’s Medicaid work requirement take effect, and who does it apply to?
Nebraska DHHS began enforcing the community engagement requirement on May 1, 2026, ahead of the federal January 1, 2027 deadline set by H.R. 1 (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act). It applies to able-bodied adults ages 19 to 64 in the Medicaid expansion population and requires at least 80 hours per month of work, approved work programs, community service, or educational activities, unless the enrollee qualifies for an exemption such as SUD treatment or medically frail status. Members with renewal dates in May or June 2026 are not subject at renewal until 2027, with phased implementation continuing through June 2027.
What is the biggest financial risk for a Nebraska behavioral health treatment center under work requirements?
Mid-episode disenrollment. KFF found that more than 18,000 people in Arkansas lost coverage under the 2018-2019 requirement, about 25% of the population subject to it, primarily because they failed to report status or document an exemption. For a 60-bed residential program at roughly $385 per Medicaid day and a 28-day average length of stay, that is roughly $10,780 per admission at risk, and $400,000 to $700,000 per year in avoidable write-offs at a single mid-size facility if the billing team does not catch the coverage loss before the 835 comes back.
Do MHPAEA parity protections still apply if the 2024 Final Rule is not being enforced?
Yes. The Departments of Labor, HHS, and Treasury announced non-enforcement of the portions of the 2024 Final Rule that are new relative to the 2013 rule on May 15, 2025, pending litigation plus an additional 18 months. The same statement preserves MHPAEA’s statutory obligations as amended by the CAA, 2021, including the NQTL comparative analysis requirement. Operators should still cite parity in denial appeals tied to work requirement disenrollment because MCOs remain bound by the statute and the 2013 regulations.
How much has Georgia’s work requirement program actually cost, and why does that matter to Nebraska operators?
The GAO reported that Georgia’s Pathways to Coverage demonstration spent $54.2 million on administrative costs between October 2020 and March 2025, compared with $26.1 million on health care benefits, and $47.4 million of the administrative total was federal money. For Nebraska behavioral health operators, that gap is a warning sign: the administrative machinery around work requirements is expensive and error-prone, and the resulting eligibility churn lands directly on provider AR unless intake, documentation, and billing workflows are rebuilt in advance.
References
- Nebraska DHHS, Medicaid Work Requirements
- Office of Governor Jim Pillen, Nebraska Announces First-in-Nation Medicaid Work Requirements
- Nebraska Public Media, As Medicaid Work Requirements Go Into Effect Friday (April 30, 2026)
- KFF, 5 Key Facts About Medicaid Work Requirements
- Sommers et al., Medicaid Work Requirements In Arkansas: Two-Year Impacts (Health Affairs)
- Tradeoffs, Medicaid Work Requirements Are Back (April 2025)
- U.S. GAO, Medicaid Demonstrations: Administrative Spending for Georgia Work Requirements (GAO-25-108160)
- The Current / ProPublica, Georgia Pathways Spent Twice as Much on Admin as on Health Care
- U.S. DOL, EBSA, Statement on Enforcement of the 2024 MHPAEA Final Rule (May 15, 2025)