Atlantic Health Strategies

Patient Brokering Exposed: What Behavioral Health Operators Need to Know About EKRA, Florida’s Patient Brokering Act, and the Marketing Contracts That Land You in Handcuffs

Table of Contents

Ready to See Results?

From strategy through execution, Atlantic Health Strategies integrates compliance, operations, and growth into durable, measurable results. Let’s put our expertise to work for your organization.

The Short Answer

Patient brokering is a federal crime under the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act (EKRA), 18 U.S.C. § 220, prosecuted by the U.S. Department of Justice, and a separate felony under state statutes like Florida’s Patient Brokering Act, Fla. Stat. § 817.505, enforced by the Florida Office of the State Attorney and the Florida Attorney General. It covers paying, offering, soliciting, or receiving anything of value in exchange for a patient referral to a treatment center, sober home, or clinical laboratory. Operators get tripped up because most brokering deals do not look like brokering on paper. They look like marketing contracts, W-2 salaries with a bonus structure, per-lead fees to a call center, or a friendly stipend to a sober home that keeps sending you admits.

The 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown put the operator-side risk in plain view. DOJ, working alongside the FBI and HHS-OIG, indicted Farrukh Jarar Ali, a Pakistani national operating a billing company called ProMD Solutions, alleging he submitted approximately $650 million in false and fraudulent claims to AHCCCS involving at least 41 substance abuse treatment clinics in Arizona, that AHCCCS paid approximately $564 million, and that Ali personally received about $24.5 million, using $2.9 million to purchase a home on a golf estate in Dubai. In a related indictment, a sober-living operator in Peoria, Arizona received approximately $739,000 in illegal kickbacks to refer individuals to Tusa Integrated Clinic, resulting in approximately $1.58 million in improper AHCCCS payments. That is not a marketing problem. That is an operator problem.

What EKRA Actually Prohibits (And Why Your Marketing Contract Is Not a Shield)

Congress passed EKRA in October 2018 as part of the SUPPORT Act. It took direct aim at behavioral health. EKRA is codified at 18 U.S.C. § 220 as an all-payor statute. Although EKRA was modeled after the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, EKRA is broader in scope: the AKS applies only to referrals involving federal healthcare programs like Medicare, but EKRA applies to any healthcare benefit program, including private insurance and cash-pay patients. That is the piece founders miss. Your cash-pay or commercial-payer facility is not exempt, and the same DOJ prosecutors and HHS-OIG agents who chase Medicare fraud will follow the commercial dollars too.

Penalties are not trivial. Under the statute, a violator shall be fined not more than $200,000, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both, for each occurrence. Per occurrence. Not per case. If a call center sent you 40 admits over a quarter and DOJ can prove intent to induce, do the math on the exposure.

The most common structure I see fail an EKRA review is the percentage-of-collections marketing agreement. In July 2025, the Ninth Circuit issued the first appellate decision interpreting EKRA in United States v. Schena. On July 11, 2025, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the criminal conviction of laboratory operator Mark Schena for EKRA violations based on compensation paid to marketers who sold testing on behalf of Schena’s laboratory. Schena was sentenced to 96 months in prison and ordered to pay more than $24 million in restitution. Prosecutors now have appellate authority in their pocket.

The Schena court’s reasoning matters for anyone running an outreach team. Judge Daniel A. Bress wrote for the court that 18 U.S.C. § 220(a)(2)(A) covers those who interface with those who do the referrals, noting that nothing in the statute requires the illegal payments be made to someone interfacing directly with patients. The court also drew a distinction founders must understand: percentage-based compensation isn’t per se illegal, but it becomes unlawful when it crosses into undue influence or deception, such as misleading physicians or taking control over their clinical decision-making. The paper does not save you. Intent does.

Florida's Patient Brokering Act: The State-Level Trap

If you operate a treatment center in Florida, EKRA is only half your problem. Under Fla. Stat. § 817.505, the Patient Brokering Act makes it illegal for providers or facilities to offer or pay a commission, benefit, bonus, rebate, kickback, or bribe, or engage in any split-fee arrangement, to induce the referral of a patient, with violators facing first, second, or third-degree felony convictions and fines from $50,000 to $500,000 per violation. Twenty patients is not a high bar for a residential program or an IOP running a full census. The Florida Department of Children and Families licenses these programs, and DCF referrals to law enforcement often ride alongside criminal charges.

Enforcement in Palm Beach County has been aggressive since the Sober Homes Task Force stood up. The Florida legislature funded the task force with a $275,000 grant to Palm Beach County, which State Attorney Dave Aronberg used to launch the County Sober Home Task Force, and since late 2016 the group has focused on treatment centers and labs throughout Palm Beach County, resulting in hundreds of arrests. As of August 2022, the State Attorney reported 121 arrests, 107 convictions, 2 guilty verdicts and 2 not guilty verdicts. Owners. Marketers. Sober home operators. Physicians. Lab reps. The task force does not care about your org chart.

The statute reaches beyond cash. One tactic sober halfway houses and dubious treatment centers use to lure patients is to offer free or reduced rent, free cigarettes, pre-paid debit cards, or other incentives. That covers the free rent you gave the sober home. The gas cards. The flights. The “scholarships” you paid on a patient’s insurance premium. All of it. On June 27, 2019, Governor Ron DeSantis signed House Bill 369 into law, effective July 1, 2019, drafted in response to a recommendation from State Attorney Dave Aronberg’s Sober Home Task Force, and intended to tackle the perceived rampant fraud associated with substance abuse treatment in Florida by implementing requirements on treatment providers, recovery residences, and lead generators. That is the arrangement the task force built its reputation prosecuting.

What Federal Enforcement Looks Like Right Now

DOJ is not slowing down on behavioral health, and neither are its partner agencies at HHS-OIG, the FBI, the DEA, and CMS Center for Program Integrity. The scale of the 2025 takedown is the tell. The Justice Department announced criminal charges against 324 defendants, including 96 doctors, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and other licensed medical professionals, in 50 federal districts and 12 State Attorneys General’s Offices, for their alleged participation in health care fraud schemes involving over $14.6 billion in intended loss. The government seized over $245 million in cash, luxury vehicles, cryptocurrency, and other assets as part of the coordinated enforcement efforts.

Federal officials framed it as a moral fight, not a billing dispute. FBI Director Kash Patel said, “Health care fraud drains critical resources from programs intended to help people who truly need medical care”. That framing changes how juries decide.

Arizona is now the epicenter. United States Attorney Timothy Courchaine announced criminal charges against seven defendants in the District of Arizona in connection with alleged schemes to obtain over $1.1 billion by the collective submission of approximately $1.65 billion in fraudulent claims to Medicaid and Medicare. Behind those numbers is a state Medicaid agency that failed. In May 2023, AHCCCS announced its initial findings of credible and willful fraud by sober-living providers across the state, and has since suspended more than 300 providers, assisted over 10,000 individuals with the humanitarian response, and implemented more than 20 new initiatives to combat fraud, waste, and abuse in the Medicaid program. That was before the June 2025 indictments landed.

How Operators Actually Stay Clean

What I tell every founder and PE-backed buyer who walks into a diligence conversation: the compliance program has to start at the marketing contract, not at the chart. Here is what an operator-side review actually looks at.

  • Compensation structure. W-2 employees, fixed salary, no commission tied to admissions or revenue. EKRA has fewer safe harbors than the AKS and notably does not protect volume-based or commission-based compensation for employees or contractors, even if they are W-2 employees. If your outreach team is paid per admit, you have an EKRA problem regardless of what your handbook says.
  • Sober home relationships. No rent subsidies. No shared staff. No “we help each other out.” Written referral policies that document clinical fit, not financial exchange.
  • Call center and lead vendors. Flat monthly fee for services rendered, benchmarked to fair market value, with deliverables that are not tied to patient volume or payer mix. Get the FMV opinion in writing.
  • Marketing agreements with third parties. No percentage of collections. No per-lead pricing that varies with conversion. Written scope, hours logged, deliverables documented. The Ninth Circuit’s message to labs, physicians, and recovery centers is that marketing arrangements must preserve provider independence, because if marketers are effectively directing referrals, the arrangement likely violates EKRA.
  • Ownership and referral overlap. If your treatment center and your lab share owners, that structure gets scrutinized hard by DOJ, HHS-OIG, and state Medicaid Fraud Control Units. Papered properly, it can work. Papered lazily, it becomes exhibit A.

Every operator I have worked with who received a subpoena had one thing in common. They knew the arrangement was aggressive. Somebody on the team, usually the CFO or the outreach director, had already flagged it. The founder chose census over caution. That is the moment a compliance program either exists or it does not.

Frequently asked questions

Does EKRA apply to my facility if we do not bill Medicare or Medicaid?

Yes. This is the single biggest misconception operators bring to a compliance review. EKRA is an all-payor statute codified at 18 U.S.C. § 220 that reaches services billed to any health care benefit program, and DOJ, HHS-OIG, and the FBI can all investigate it. As Morgan Lewis summarized after the Ninth Circuit’s Schena ruling, the AKS applies only to referrals involving federal healthcare programs, but EKRA applies to any healthcare benefit program, including private insurance and cash-pay patients. Cash-pay boutique programs are not exempt. Commercial-payer PHPs and IOPs are not exempt. If you pay for referrals, EKRA reaches you.

Can I pay my outreach team a commission if they are W-2 employees?

Be very careful. EKRA has a narrow employee exception, and its safe harbor language is narrower than the Anti-Kickback Statute equivalent. As Morgan Lewis notes, EKRA does not protect volume-based or commission-based compensation for employees or contractors, even if they are W-2 employees, so arrangements that might be lawful under the AKS may still violate EKRA. Percentage-of-collections comp and per-admit bonuses have been the subject of federal prosecutions by DOJ. The safer path is fixed salary with bonuses tied to activity metrics that are not volume-of-referrals or revenue-generated. Get a healthcare attorney to review the comp plan before rollout, not after a subpoena.

What penalties do operators actually face for patient brokering?

Federal EKRA violations under 18 U.S.C. § 220 carry up to 10 years in prison and fines up to $200,000 per occurrence, prosecuted by DOJ. Under Florida’s Patient Brokering Act, Fla. Stat. § 817.505, violators may be convicted of a first, second, or third-degree felony and fined from $50,000 to $500,000 per violation, prosecuted by the local State Attorney or the Florida Attorney General. Real federal sentences include Mark Schena’s 96-month prison term and more than $24 million in restitution in the case that produced the Ninth Circuit’s first EKRA appellate ruling. State licensure revocation through the Florida Department of Children and Families and payer network termination by commercial carriers typically follow.

Our sober home partner sends us patients and we pay them a monthly fee. Is that legal?

Almost certainly not, unless the fee is tied to specific, documented services at fair market value with no reference to referral volume. Florida’s Patient Brokering Act explicitly covers commissions, benefits, bonuses, rebates, kickbacks, bribes, and split-fee arrangements used to induce a referral, and violators can face fines from $50,000 to $500,000 per violation. A monthly stipend to a sober home that happens to feed you patients is the exact fact pattern the Palm Beach County Sober Homes Task Force has prosecuted for nearly a decade, and the same fact pattern DOJ and HHS-OIG alleged in the 2025 Arizona AHCCCS indictments, where one sober-living operator allegedly received approximately $739,000 in illegal kickbacks for referrals to a single outpatient clinic. Restructure now, before someone else does it for you.

Request a Free Consultation

Scroll to Top